Saturday, June 30, 2018
Friday, June 29, 2018
Karachi Bar Association Resolution condemn the Honerable Chief Justice of Pakistan Mr Nisar
Karachi BAR will get their pots and pans tossed around in the next trip .... pic.twitter.com/T8HsdlZozA
— Muneef Bokhari (@MuneefBokhari) June 29, 2018
Karachi Bar's resolution against CJP's conduct. pic.twitter.com/f5jLKfcwXT
— Hasnaat Malik (@HasnaatMalik) June 29, 2018
Friday, June 22, 2018
Caretaker PM in Karachi !
👆Forget NS and Zardari! See the Caretaker PM arrive in Karachi !
— Rameel Ahmad (@RameelAhmad) June 21, 2018
Ye Qom apnay rehnuma ki talash may hy.. pic.twitter.com/G3tygaiq6f
Thursday, June 21, 2018
2nd day of eid Traffic Jam
#Karachi: Aerial view of #UniversityRoad's massive traffic jam on 2nd day of #Eid from #FerrisWheel in #AskariAmusementPark. #KHIAlerts pic.twitter.com/6nNHui488A
— SherY - (@SherySyed_) June 19, 2018
Friday, June 15, 2018
PM @Theresa_May on Eid al-Fitr
"The end of the holy month of Ramadan is a time for Muslims to come together with family, friends and neighbours. It’s an opportunity for spiritual renewal." PM @Theresa_May on Eid al-Fitr pic.twitter.com/j8ABD1JjDp
— UK Prime Minister (@10DowningStreet) June 14, 2018
Thursday, June 14, 2018
New IGP Sindh
New Chief Secretaries & Inspector Generals of Police. Punjab CS: Akbar Durrani IGP: Kaleem Imam KP CS: Naveed Kamran Baloch IGP: Muhammad Tahir Sindh CS: Azam Sulaiman IGP: Amjad Javed Saleemi Balochistan CS: Dr Akhtar Nazir IGP: Mohsin Butt.Federal government has changed Chief Secretaries & IGP of all four provinces to ensure impartial & transparent elections. Akbar Hussain appointed as Chief Secretary Punjab, Azam Salman Sindh, Akhtar Nazir Balochistan, & Naveed Kamran as chief secretary of KP. pic.twitter.com/T1kqjU8FeS— Govt of Pakistan (@pid_gov) June 13, 2018
Justics Qazi Faez Isa 's Seven Question in Sh Rasheed Disqualification Case
Civil Appeal No. 467 of 2015
25. We therefore request the Hon’ble Chief Justice to constitute a bench, preferably the Full Court, since every judge of this Court has heard election disputes and acquired invaluable knowledge which will undoubtedly better help to decide the following questions of law, which have arisen in this appeal, and which will also arise in other cases:
Q.1. Does every nondisclosure or misdeclaration in the Nomination Form result in the disqualification of a candidate or only those whereby one has circumvented some inherent legal disability to participate in an election?
Q.2. If a petition does not disclose the particular facts, on the basis of which disqualification is sought, can these be considered when subsequently disclosed in the affidavit-in-evidence of the petitioner or which may otherwise be discovered during the hearing before the tribunal/court?
Q.3. Does Article 225 of the Constitution exclude the application of Article 184(3) of the Constitution to election disputes?
Q.4. If the answer to the foregoing question is in the negative, then is an election dispute regarding an individual’s qualification or disqualification a matter of “public importance” which requires the “enforcement” of a Fundamental Right and if so can it be determined under Article 184(3) of the Constitution?
Q.5. If the answer to the foregoing question is in the affirmative, are the procedural and evidentiary rules governing election petitions and appeals under the ROPA the same as those governing petitions under Article 184(3) of the Constitution?
Q.6. Does the “court of law” mentioned in Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution include the Supreme Court when exercising jurisdiction under Article 184 (3)?
Q.7. If a candidate is disqualified on account of nondisclosure or misdeclaration does such disqualification subsist only till the next elections or is it permanent?
25. We therefore request the Hon’ble Chief Justice to constitute a bench, preferably the Full Court, since every judge of this Court has heard election disputes and acquired invaluable knowledge which will undoubtedly better help to decide the following questions of law, which have arisen in this appeal, and which will also arise in other cases:
Q.1. Does every nondisclosure or misdeclaration in the Nomination Form result in the disqualification of a candidate or only those whereby one has circumvented some inherent legal disability to participate in an election?
Q.2. If a petition does not disclose the particular facts, on the basis of which disqualification is sought, can these be considered when subsequently disclosed in the affidavit-in-evidence of the petitioner or which may otherwise be discovered during the hearing before the tribunal/court?
Q.3. Does Article 225 of the Constitution exclude the application of Article 184(3) of the Constitution to election disputes?
Q.4. If the answer to the foregoing question is in the negative, then is an election dispute regarding an individual’s qualification or disqualification a matter of “public importance” which requires the “enforcement” of a Fundamental Right and if so can it be determined under Article 184(3) of the Constitution?
Q.5. If the answer to the foregoing question is in the affirmative, are the procedural and evidentiary rules governing election petitions and appeals under the ROPA the same as those governing petitions under Article 184(3) of the Constitution?
Q.6. Does the “court of law” mentioned in Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution include the Supreme Court when exercising jurisdiction under Article 184 (3)?
Q.7. If a candidate is disqualified on account of nondisclosure or misdeclaration does such disqualification subsist only till the next elections or is it permanent?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)