https://twitter.com/CommissionerKhi/status/1294909357898059777?s=09
Showing posts with label SC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SC. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 26, 2020
Friday, January 18, 2019
New Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan
Justice Asif Saeed Khosa to be sworn in as 26th Chief Justice of ...
The News International-11 hours ago
ISLAMABAD: Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, will take oath as the 26th Chief Justice of Pakistan on Friday (January 18), after the retirement of ...
'Suo motu notices to be taken sparingly,' says Justice Khosa at full ...
In-Depth-DAWN.com-22 hours ago
In-Depth-DAWN.com-22 hours ago
Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa
آصف سعید خان کھوسہ | |
|---|---|
| 26th Chief Justice of Pakistan | |
| Assumed office 18 January 2019 | |
| Appointed by | Arif Alvi |
| Preceded by | Mian Saqib Nisar |
| Senior Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| In office 31 December 2016 – 17 January 2019 | |
| Preceded by | Mian Saqib Nisar |
| Succeeded by | Gulzar Ahmed |
| Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| Assumed office 18 February 2010 | |
| Appointed by | Asif Ali Zardari |
| Justice of the Lahore High Court | |
| In office 21 May 1998 – 17 February 2010 | |
| Advocate of the Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| In office 12 September 1985 – 20 May 1998 | |
| Advocate of the Lahore High Court | |
| In office 13 November 1979 – Unknown date | |
| Personal details | |
| Born | 21 December 1954 Dera Ghazi Khan, Punjab, Pakistan |
| Nationality |  Pakistani |
| Relations | Nasim Hasan Shah (father-in-law) Nasir Mahmood Khosa (brother) Tariq Masood Khosa (brother)[1] |
| Alma mater | University of Cambridge (Trips-I, LL.M.) Lincoln’s Inn (Bar at Law) University of Punjab (B.A., M.A.) Government College, Lahore (Inter) [2] |
Thursday, June 14, 2018
Justics Qazi Faez Isa 's Seven Question in Sh Rasheed Disqualification Case
Civil Appeal No. 467 of 2015
25. We therefore request the Hon’ble Chief Justice to constitute a bench, preferably the Full Court, since every judge of this Court has heard election disputes and acquired invaluable knowledge which will undoubtedly better help to decide the following questions of law, which have arisen in this appeal, and which will also arise in other cases:
Q.1. Does every nondisclosure or misdeclaration in the Nomination Form result in the disqualification of a candidate or only those whereby one has circumvented some inherent legal disability to participate in an election?
Q.2. If a petition does not disclose the particular facts, on the basis of which disqualification is sought, can these be considered when subsequently disclosed in the affidavit-in-evidence of the petitioner or which may otherwise be discovered during the hearing before the tribunal/court?
Q.3. Does Article 225 of the Constitution exclude the application of Article 184(3) of the Constitution to election disputes?
Q.4. If the answer to the foregoing question is in the negative, then is an election dispute regarding an individual’s qualification or disqualification a matter of “public importance” which requires the “enforcement” of a Fundamental Right and if so can it be determined under Article 184(3) of the Constitution?
Q.5. If the answer to the foregoing question is in the affirmative, are the procedural and evidentiary rules governing election petitions and appeals under the ROPA the same as those governing petitions under Article 184(3) of the Constitution?
Q.6. Does the “court of law” mentioned in Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution include the Supreme Court when exercising jurisdiction under Article 184 (3)?
Q.7. If a candidate is disqualified on account of nondisclosure or misdeclaration does such disqualification subsist only till the next elections or is it permanent?
25. We therefore request the Hon’ble Chief Justice to constitute a bench, preferably the Full Court, since every judge of this Court has heard election disputes and acquired invaluable knowledge which will undoubtedly better help to decide the following questions of law, which have arisen in this appeal, and which will also arise in other cases:
Q.1. Does every nondisclosure or misdeclaration in the Nomination Form result in the disqualification of a candidate or only those whereby one has circumvented some inherent legal disability to participate in an election?
Q.2. If a petition does not disclose the particular facts, on the basis of which disqualification is sought, can these be considered when subsequently disclosed in the affidavit-in-evidence of the petitioner or which may otherwise be discovered during the hearing before the tribunal/court?
Q.3. Does Article 225 of the Constitution exclude the application of Article 184(3) of the Constitution to election disputes?
Q.4. If the answer to the foregoing question is in the negative, then is an election dispute regarding an individual’s qualification or disqualification a matter of “public importance” which requires the “enforcement” of a Fundamental Right and if so can it be determined under Article 184(3) of the Constitution?
Q.5. If the answer to the foregoing question is in the affirmative, are the procedural and evidentiary rules governing election petitions and appeals under the ROPA the same as those governing petitions under Article 184(3) of the Constitution?
Q.6. Does the “court of law” mentioned in Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution include the Supreme Court when exercising jurisdiction under Article 184 (3)?
Q.7. If a candidate is disqualified on account of nondisclosure or misdeclaration does such disqualification subsist only till the next elections or is it permanent?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)